Sunday 6 November 2011

A bitch on twilight


Mostly Braking Dawn part 1 (this is not a bitch on it, as a movie, more it as in context of movie)

It’s about the sex in the movie!

For one why is it actually in the movie? It’s not in the book, well, yeah, it is, but it’s not. Not the way there doing it in the movie and even more so shouldn’t they not put it in like a real thing because it’s a tween movie!

Next thing will happen is that the movie will be rated to high got the people that love it (I know adults like it too—but hell it’s a tween movie threw and threw)

Though it’s not something I’m going to watch (they are really shitty movies. Badly written and—no, wait, if I keep on going well be here all night, but I thought, especially with the first one, that the people that wrote the screen play it a really bad job, and it didn’t get better in the second one). Still I don’t get why they need to glorify the sex, it’s not like anyone (teenage) is going to see the whole, ‘oh, they got married first, so that’s why it’s okay’, they will just see the sex. Just the sex. the sex with a (ugly) vampire. But at least she gets pregnant after that, it’s a good thing that sex leads to pregnancy, since it does—but do you think they will see that either?


I just don’t get why they need to push at it. To make it so much bigger or seeable then it was in the book. Do they think that we are all stupid and we wouldn’t get it after the fact, or even before it? Hell, most of the people watching the movie has read the books, the others, aren’t stupid (well....)

But then in the Element Encyclopadia of Vampires, by Theresa Cheung they show us why...

  Alucard
Alucard is ‘Dracula’ spelled backwards. The name was first used by actor Lon Chaney Jr. as the name of the vampire in the 1943 film Son of Dracula. It is often used by writers and filmmakers as an obvious plot device to show how little regard the vampire had for the intellect of humans; it typically takes the human characters a lot of time to unravel the name’s true meaning. This inability to comprehend the vampire’s true identity, despite it being blindingly obvious to readers and viewers, illustrates why the vampire’s contempt for humans is justified.

Isn’t that how they see us? Stupid, is how they regard their viewers, even when they want to make it as if the humans where stupid, they make it as if we are when they do things because they think we as humans can’t understand under context. They shit that runs under everything. They play us as if we are dumb as bat shit, and yet we put up with it. Why?

Well really why wouldn’t we? It’s not like we want a boring life, you kinda just have to put up with shit when it’s all there is. And movies are one of them. I do sometimes like to think it’s the directors that are dumb, or maybe even the producer, ‘cause that way its okay for them to do things like they do, but let’s face it, that’s just something to think, to make yourself feel better but ultimately it’s for our benefit. It’s kinda upsetting that they are so high and mighty that they believe we are something so dumb they need to talk down to us, don’t you think?

Still (and sorry ‘bout the detour rather than bypass) why they need to glorify something that’s gonna make parents pissed and bitchy about letting their babies watch it.

Mostly they could have just done the whole honeymoon like the book and it would have been nice, simple and beautiful. At least it’s what I think when it comes to it. I don’t like—or have lots of problems with the vampire sex full stop, cause(—again, I’ll stop myself because you probably don’t want to know, or I have already said as much). It would all be better if they left the sex as a black spot on the screen, a fade away than light, and there they are in bed, her all bruised, instead that part of the whole scene, which reluctance from him, isn’t going to be there. Or it is, but when he gets to fucking her again, it’s....what, totally fine and he’s not as scared of it? And if you have read the book they leave pretty much the day after he craves, right?

But I guess they do have to make two movies out of one book that didn’t need it all that much, like really, how are they going to make it interesting threw two movies—ha! They don’t need to, really, even if this one sucks, you’ll all have to know how it ends. I know I would.

Well, that’s it, just the Why? really.
    Thanks for your time

No comments:

Post a Comment